- 2017
- Danish IP fair - Copenhagen 2017
June 20 - 2017 - 2016
- Christmas closing
December 12 - 2016 - Temporary close-down of DKPTO websites
July 1 - 2016 - Notice concerning the Japan earthquakes
May 4 - 2016 - 2015
- Christmas closing
December 17 - 2015 - Calculation of a SPC's duration - Case C-471/14 Seattle Genetics
October 21 - 2015 - Bill passed at parliament
March 27 - 2015 - How DKPTO handles SPC applications
March 4 - 2015 - 2013
- Denmark participate in Global PPH program
January 7 - 2014 - PPH program between Israel and Denmark extended indefinitely
January 6 - 2014 - PPH program between China and Denmark extended
December 27 - 2013 - PPH program between Japan and Denmark to be amended as of October 1, 2013
September 18 - 2013 - PPH program for Canadian applicants amended as of July 30, 2013
July 30 - 2013 - New PPH 2.0 program between the USPTO and the DKPTO
May 21 - 2013 - Israel and Denmark continues and expand its PPH program
January 3 - 2013 - 2012
- New PPH program between the Danish Patent and Trademark Office and the State Intellectual Property Office of the P.R.C.
December 27 - 2012 - New strategic partnership between Hong Kong Trade Development Council and the Danish Patent and Trademark Office
December 11 - 2012 - IP Trade Portal
June 27 - 2012 - New PPH programs between the Danish Patent and Trademark Office and the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (ROSPATENT)
January 25 - 2012 - New PPH program between the Danish Patent and Trademark Office and the Israeli Patent Office
January 5 - 2012 - All it-systems online
- 2011
- New PCT-PPH program between USPTO and DKPTO
October 31 - 2011 - Upgrade of our ERP-system
October 17 - 2011 - New PCT-Patent Prosecution Highway program between JPO and DKPTO
September 30 - 2011 - Extension of our PPH with Canada
September 28 - 2011 - DKPTO receives recognition for Anti-Counterfeiting activities
June 10 - 2011 - Twinning project in Armenia
May 27 - 2011 - IPR Spring Meeting 2011
May 27 - 2011 - Temporary close-down of DKPTO websites
May 13 - 2011 - Danish Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Guidelines amended
April 28 - 2011 - Notice concerning the situation in Japan
March 29 - 2011 - Greenland joins int. TM and design system
January 3 - 2011 - 2010
- Christmas Closing
December 13 - 2010 - Visit of NOIP Delegation to Denmark
December 6 - 2010 - On-the-job trainings
October 11 - 2010 - Jesper Kongstad elected Chairman of Administrative Council
July 6 - 2010 - Council of EAPO reveal advantages of Eurasian patent for Russia
June 29 - 2010 - New Report on IPR Enforcement for SMEs
June 17 - 2010 - TM View - First month has been a success
May 26 - 2010 - TM view - free access to more than 5 mio trade marks
April 15 - 2010 - Danish applicants make use of PPH
March 5 - 2010 - DKPTO statement on the ONEL case
March 5 - 2010 - Extension of our PPH with KIPO
February 18 - 2010 - Project in Moldova
February 15 - 2010 - IPeuropAware - Training enforcement ambassadors in 19 European countries
January 5 - 2010 - 2009
- The Nordic Patent Institute enters a new phase
December 4 - 2009 - Beta version of TMview goes live
November 16 - 2009 - Continuation of PPH with USPTO
October 27 - 2009 - New PPH-agreement between Denmark and Canada
October 6 - 2009 - Status and Perspectives
September 10 - 2009 - News about piracy from around the world
September 4 - 2009 - High level visit from Croatia
September 4 - 2009 - IP Response
August 21 - 2009 - DKPTO Director General is a candidate for EPO presidency
August 20 - 2009 - Audio clip: Mr. Francis Gurry’s speech from the DKPTO Spring Conference
July 1 - 2009 - IRT report to ICANN on gTLD'erne
June 24 - 2009 - Audio clip: Takashi Suzuki's speech from the DKPTO Spring Conference
June 8 - 2009
Danish Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Guidelines amended
Following a Plurilateral PPH Heads of Offices meeting at the USPTO in March 2011, the Danish Patent and Trademark Office (DKPTO) has amended its PPH Guidelines.
The Heads of Offices decided a new definition of “Claim correspondence” common to all PPH agreements/guidelines:
”All claims on file, as originally filed or as amended, for examination under the PPH must sufficiently correspond to one or more of those claims indicated as allowable in the Office of First Filing (OFF).
Claims are considered to "sufficiently correspond" where, accounting for differences due to translations and claim format, the claims in the Office of Second Filing (OSF) are of the same or similar scope as the claims in the OFF, or the claims in the OSF are narrower in scope than the claims in the OFF.
In this regard, a claim that is narrower in scope occurs when an OFF claim is amended to be further limited by an additional feature that is supported in the specification (description and/or claims).
A claim in the OSF which introduces a new/different category of claims to those claims indicated as allowable in the OFF is not considered to sufficiently correspond. For example, the OFF claims only contain claims to a process of manufacturing a product, then the claims in the OSF are not considered to sufficiently correspond if the OSF claims introduce product claims that are dependent on the corresponding process claims.”.
The DK Guidelines for US, JP, Korean and Canadian users has been amended accordingly.